FLJH vs. AIRR
FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJH returned 20.54%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLJH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
FLJH vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return.
FLJH
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 45.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.54%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 67.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
FLJH vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 18.85% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -14.66% | 1.26% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -20.57% | 3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJH and AIRR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FLJH and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLJH vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLJH
AIRR
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
FLJH
AIRR
Technology
FLJH
AIRR
Financial Services
FLJH
AIRR
Consumer Cyclical
FLJH
AIRR
-
Communication Services
FLJH
AIRR
-
Healthcare
FLJH
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
FLJH
AIRR
-
Consumer Defensive
FLJH
AIRR
-
Real Estate
FLJH
AIRR
-
Utilities
FLJH
AIRR
-
Energy
FLJH
AIRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJH vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
FLJH
AIRR
FLJH vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLJH | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.40 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 5.01 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 18.33 | -2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLJH vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJH | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -42.37% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -13.09% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -27.95% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -27.95% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.89% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -7.48% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.57% | -0.79% |
Volatility
FLJH vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 5.20%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJH | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 9.32% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 20.81% | -6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 26.19% | -7.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 25.45% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 26.36% | -6.52% |
FLJH vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLJH vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.28% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJH and AIRR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to FLJH (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 20.54% for FLJH. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 20.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
FLJH is categorized as Japan Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJH and 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJH and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer