FLIN vs. XLE
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.89%/yr vs 20.12%/yr for XLE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
FLIN vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -10.29% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -10.29%
- 6M
- -8.41%
- 1Y
- -11.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
FLIN vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -10.29% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -7.13% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -14.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and XLE is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.25 |
The correlation between FLIN and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLIN vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIN
XLE
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLIN
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLIN
XLE
-
Industrials
FLIN
XLE
-
Energy
FLIN
XLE
Basic Materials
FLIN
XLE
-
Technology
FLIN
XLE
-
Healthcare
FLIN
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
FLIN
XLE
-
Utilities
FLIN
XLE
-
Communication Services
FLIN
XLE
-
Real Estate
FLIN
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
XLE
FLIN vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLIN | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.30 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 3.10 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 8.63 | -10.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -71.26% | +29.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -12.05% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -20.14% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | -26.04% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -8.01% | -9.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.04% | -17.97% | +9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 4.32% | +3.61% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) is 4.11%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that FLIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 7.26% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 16.79% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 20.57% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 26.05% | -10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 29.58% | -9.15% |
FLIN vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIN vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.62% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and XLE have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FLIN (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.12% vs 3.89% for FLIN. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.62% for FLIN.
FLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer