FLIN vs. RBIL
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLIN returned -8.50% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
FLIN vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -8.98%
- 1Y
- -8.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -8.37% | 10.66% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.32% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and RBIL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
RBIL
FLIN vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLIN | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 2.13 | -1.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 7.82 | -8.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 42.95 | -44.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -0.52% | -41.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -0.52% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.64% | -0.50% | -15.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -0.07% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.10% | 0.10% | +8.00% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that FLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 0.36% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 0.85% | +12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 0.95% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 1.07% | +14.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 1.07% | +19.36% |
FLIN vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIN vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and RBIL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLIN has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.07% vs -8.50% for FLIN. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.07% return vs -8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.43% for FLIN.
FLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer