FLIN vs. FLAU
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Franklin Templeton - FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index while FLAU tracks the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.83%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for FLAU. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.
Performance
FLIN vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -10.73% return, which is significantly lower than FLAU's 10.26% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -10.73%
- 6M
- -10.25%
- 1Y
- -10.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FLAU
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -10.73% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 10.26% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 11.00% | 23.38% | -10.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and FLAU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FLIN and FLAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLIN vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIN
FLAU
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLIN
FLAU
Consumer Cyclical
FLIN
FLAU
Industrials
FLIN
FLAU
Energy
FLIN
FLAU
Basic Materials
FLIN
FLAU
Technology
FLIN
FLAU
Healthcare
FLIN
FLAU
Consumer Defensive
FLIN
FLAU
Utilities
FLIN
FLAU
Communication Services
FLIN
FLAU
Real Estate
FLIN
FLAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
FLAU
FLIN vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLIN | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 1.52 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 4.69 | -6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLIN | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 0.92 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.30 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and FLAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -45.73% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -10.01% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -22.03% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | -24.68% | +1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.81% | -3.30% | -14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -6.79% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.62% | 3.24% | +4.38% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 5.35% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 13.65% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 16.63% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 19.60% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 23.58% | -3.13% |
FLIN vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIN vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FLAU's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.63% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and FLAU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLAU has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to FLIN (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs FLAU's -45.73%.
On 5-year performance, FLAU leads with 5.94% vs 3.83% for FLIN. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLAU has performed better with a 5.94% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.63% for FLIN.
FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.09% for FLAU.
FLAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and FLAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer