PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIIX vs. FRNRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIIX achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than FRNRX's 26.03% return.


FLIIX

1D
0.96%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
8.39%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*

FRNRX

1D
1.79%
1M
1.79%
YTD
26.03%
6M
28.84%
1Y
57.42%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
23.88%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLIIX
First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.39%9.16%5.55%3.21%-4.06%12.94%-0.16%31.02%-6.06%11.43%
FRNRX
Franklin Natural Resources Fund
26.03%30.43%1.28%3.25%30.52%74.38%-21.58%10.03%-23.78%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIIX and FRNRX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.49

The correlation between FLIIX and FRNRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIIX vs. FRNRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIIX
FLIIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FLIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNRX
FRNRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLIIXFRNRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.45

3.61

-3.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.63

4.47

-3.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.61

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

9.01

-8.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.91

32.16

-30.25

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the FRNRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIIX and FRNRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLIIXFRNRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

3.61

-3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.94

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.29

+0.18

Drawdowns

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIIX drawdown since its inception was -35.85%, smaller than the maximum FRNRX drawdown of -80.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIIX and FRNRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIIXFRNRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.85%

-80.54%

+44.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-6.53%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-19.65%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-26.29%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

0.00%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-23.83%

+18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.83%

+1.11%

Volatility

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) is 3.99%, while Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that FLIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIIXFRNRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.54%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

12.87%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

16.37%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

25.57%

-11.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

28.57%

-12.90%

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNRX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIIX vs. FRNRX - Dividend Comparison

FLIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLIIX
First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%5.37%2.46%4.79%6.31%5.71%6.32%4.13%6.91%0.00%0.00%
FRNRX
Franklin Natural Resources Fund
1.34%1.70%2.40%1.98%2.38%22.66%2.39%1.64%2.43%1.16%1.02%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIIX and FRNRX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRNRX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to FLIIX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIIX dropped -35.85% vs FRNRX's -80.54%.

FRNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIIX and FRNRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer