PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIFX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class (FLIFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIFX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 12.56% return.


FLIFX

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.32%
6M
3.10%
YTD
4.26%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.16%

FCTKX

1D
-1.40%
1M
-0.10%
6M
9.29%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class
4.26%11.69%6.72%11.26%-14.40%6.74%11.56%17.03%-3.43%5.72%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
12.56%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIFX and FCTKX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.91

The correlation between FLIFX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIFX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIFX
FLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class (FLIFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLIFXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.55

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

11.03

-1.02

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIFX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum FCTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIFX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIFXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-30.94%

+11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.37%

-9.78%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.72%

-15.40%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-27.16%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-2.11%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-5.41%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

2.26%

-1.25%

Volatility

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class (FLIFX) is 2.05%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that FLIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIFXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

5.36%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.88%

12.15%

-7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

14.14%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

15.28%

-7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.45%

15.94%

-8.49%

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIFX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

FLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than FCTKX's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.20%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%0.00%0.00%
FLIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class
4.88%5.42%5.17%2.56%3.09%2.80%2.63%18.76%3.14%1.94%1.84%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FLIFX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to FLIFX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIFX dropped -19.54% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FLIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIFX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer