FLIFX vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class (FLIFX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
FLIFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
FLIFX vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLIFX vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class | -0.26% | 11.69% | 6.72% | 11.26% | -14.40% | 6.74% | 11.56% | 17.03% | -3.43% | 12.60% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | -0.59% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIFX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FLIFX has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 6.05%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.
FLIFX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
AOA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLIFX vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLIFX vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
FLIFX
AOA
FLIFX vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class (FLIFX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLIFX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.35 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.97 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.98 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.92 | 8.82 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLIFX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.35 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.62 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.72 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.65 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIFX and AOA is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLIFX vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
FLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than AOA's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class | 5.43% | 5.42% | 5.17% | 2.56% | 3.09% | 2.80% | 2.63% | 18.76% | 3.14% | 1.94% | 1.84% | 1.91% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.19% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FLIFX vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIFX and AOA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIFX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -28.38% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -9.62% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -23.62% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.54% | -28.38% | +8.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -5.18% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -4.08% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 2.16% | -1.05% |
Volatility
FLIFX vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Investor Class (FLIFX) is 2.66%, while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that FLIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLIFX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 5.28% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.91% | 8.34% | -4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.39% | 13.87% | -7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 12.92% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 13.51% | -6.04% |