FLIAX vs. PAXDX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FLIAX (First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund) and PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FLIAX returned 6.23%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for PAXDX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLIAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for PAXDX.

Performance

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIAX achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.

FLIAX

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: 11.36%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: —

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.89%
• 1Y: 6.79%
• 3Y*: 8.84%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund	14.62%	-0.20%	12.21%	0.59%	-5.85%	24.12%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	10.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIAX and PAXDX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2021	0.63

The correlation between FLIAX and PAXDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLIAX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIAX

FLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 18
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLIAX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	0.96	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	1.35	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	1.73	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.05	5.13	-2.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the PAXDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIAX and PAXDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLIAX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	0.96	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.28	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.52	0.00

Drawdowns

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIAX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum PAXDX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIAX and PAXDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLIAX	PAXDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.23%	-33.58%	+10.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	-4.49%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.12%	-14.56%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.23%	-25.04%	+1.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-0.74%	-1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.46%	-5.27%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	1.47%	+2.08%

Volatility

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison

First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLIAX	PAXDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	0.00%	+4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	4.55%	+8.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	8.07%	+7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	13.19%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.82%	16.51%	-0.69%

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLIAX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison

FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.21%	2.90%	19.90%	5.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	2.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLIAX and PAXDX in my portfolio?

FLIAX and PAXDX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLIAX or PAXDX?

FLIAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIAX dropped -23.23% vs PAXDX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAXDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.