FLIA vs. FLIN
FLIA (Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIA is a International Government Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. FLIA is actively managed, while FLIN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIA returned 0.89%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for FLIN. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
FLIA vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIA achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.92% return.
FLIA
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- -11.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
FLIA vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIA Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.03% | 2.12% | 2.42% | 7.17% | -7.68% | -1.98% | 1.37% | 7.58% | -2.59% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -11.92% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIA and FLIN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, FLIA and FLIN have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FLIA vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIA
FLIN
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FLIA
FLIN
Technology
FLIA
FLIN
Basic Materials
FLIA
-
FLIN
Communication Services
FLIA
-
FLIN
Consumer Cyclical
FLIA
-
FLIN
Consumer Defensive
FLIA
-
FLIN
Energy
FLIA
-
FLIN
Healthcare
FLIA
-
FLIN
Industrials
FLIA
-
FLIN
Real Estate
FLIA
-
FLIN
Utilities
FLIA
-
FLIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIA vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
FLIA
FLIN
FLIA vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLIA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.88 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.62 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | -1.54 | +4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLIA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | -0.78 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.23 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.26 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FLIA vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIA drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIA and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -41.90% | +30.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -18.79% | +16.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.77% | -22.85% | +20.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | -22.85% | +13.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -18.91% | +18.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -8.01% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 7.57% | -6.80% |
Volatility
FLIA vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) is 1.18%, while Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that FLIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 5.21% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 12.81% | -10.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 14.92% | -11.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 15.74% | -11.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 20.45% | -15.74% |
FLIA vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIA vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
FLIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIA Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF | 2.70% | 2.62% | 2.97% | 0.93% | 18.12% | 2.26% | 0.43% | 2.93% | 1.23% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIA and FLIN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLIN has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FLIA (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIA dropped -11.24% vs FLIN's -41.90%.
On 5-year performance, FLIN leads with 3.56% vs 0.89% for FLIA. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIA has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLIN has performed better with a 3.56% return vs 0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLIA.
FLIA has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.
FLIA is categorized as International Government Bonds, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLIA and 0.19% for FLIN.
FLIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIA and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer