FLGR vs. IBIC
FLGR (Franklin FTSE Germany ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLGR returned 5.20% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FLGR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
FLGR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.39% return.
FLGR
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 5.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLGR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | -0.25% | 36.67% | 10.63% | 8.87% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGR and IBIC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between FLGR and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
FLGR
IBIC
FLGR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLGR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 2.21 | -1.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 16.41 | -16.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 58.11 | -57.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLGR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -0.90% | -45.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -0.27% | -14.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.92% | -0.11% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -0.10% | -12.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 0.08% | +5.06% |
Volatility
FLGR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that FLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 0.16% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 0.67% | +13.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 0.89% | +16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 1.57% | +18.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 1.57% | +19.84% |
FLGR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLGR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 0.32% | 1.72% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.50% | 2.67% | 2.61% | 2.52% | 3.06% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLGR has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, FLGR leads with 5.20% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FLGR has performed better with a 5.20% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.32% for FLGR.
FLGR is categorized as Europe Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGR and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGR and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer