PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGR vs. DBEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than DBEZ's 9.52% return.


FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*

DBEZ

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.81%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.46%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-10.81%-2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGR and DBEZ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FLGR and DBEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGR
DBEZ

Industrials

30.5%
21.9%

Financial Services

21.7%
23.1%

Technology

13.9%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.7%

Communication Services

6.3%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.6%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.7%

Utilities

5.0%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.4%

Energy

-

4.4%

Industrials

FLGR
30.5%
DBEZ
21.9%

Financial Services

FLGR
21.7%
DBEZ
23.1%

Technology

FLGR
13.9%
DBEZ
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGR
8.2%
DBEZ
8.7%

Communication Services

FLGR
6.3%
DBEZ
4.0%

Basic Materials

FLGR
5.9%
DBEZ
4.6%

Healthcare

FLGR
5.8%
DBEZ
5.7%

Utilities

FLGR
5.0%
DBEZ
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLGR
1.4%
DBEZ
5.3%

Real Estate

FLGR
1.3%
DBEZ
1.4%

Energy

FLGR

-

DBEZ
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGR vs. DBEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGRDBEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.24

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

1.72

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

6.67

-6.04

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the DBEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGR and DBEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGRDBEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

1.30

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.72

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.59

-0.32

Drawdowns

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, which is greater than DBEZ's maximum drawdown of -38.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and DBEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGRDBEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-38.76%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-11.03%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-15.59%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.54%

-23.38%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-0.83%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-5.81%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

2.83%

+2.20%

Volatility

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) at 5.60%. This indicates that FLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGRDBEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

5.60%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.03%

12.02%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

14.57%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

16.43%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

18.36%

+3.07%

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEZ's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLGR vs. DBEZ - Dividend Comparison

FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than DBEZ's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
3.84%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGR and DBEZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to DBEZ (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs DBEZ's -38.76%.

On 5-year performance, DBEZ leads with 11.78% vs 6.45% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGR and 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGR and DBEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer