FLEU vs. FLSW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLEU (Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF) and FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from Franklin Templeton - FLEU tracks the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net while FLSW tracks the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEU returned 11.75%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for FLSW. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.

Performance

FLEU vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 4.52% return.

FLEU

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 7.40%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 20.48%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: —

FLSW

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 6M: 3.79%
• 1Y: 17.63%
• 3Y*: 12.98%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEU vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF	7.40%	41.56%	2.26%	16.21%	-9.14%	23.27%	0.95%	26.94%	-6.19%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	4.52%	32.92%	-1.77%	16.79%	-18.14%	20.82%	13.25%	31.66%	-7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEU and FLSW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.70

The correlation between FLEU and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLEU vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLEU	FLSW
Financial Services	24.6%	17.6%
Industrials	20.7%	14.1%
Technology	16.3%	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	5.7%
Utilities	6.6%	0.2%
Healthcare	5.6%	37.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	13.7%
Basic Materials	4.2%	7.8%
Energy	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.6%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FLEU vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEU

FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 34
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FLSW

FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 31
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEU vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLEU	FLSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.14	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.71	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.20	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.32	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	4.20	+1.37

FLEU vs. FLSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the FLSW Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEU and FLSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLEU vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and FLSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLEU	FLSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-28.16%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-13.38%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.67%	-13.38%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.67%	-28.16%	+9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-3.81%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-5.95%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	4.21%	-0.52%

Volatility

FLEU vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 4.57%. This indicates that FLEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLEU	FLSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	4.57%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.05%	12.43%	+2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	15.65%	+1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	15.76%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.27%	16.88%	+1.39%

FLEU vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLEU and FLSW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLEU vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison

FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than FLSW's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF	1.08%	2.22%	3.18%	3.25%	21.45%	3.03%	1.94%	6.06%	12.17%	0.07%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	0.12%	2.12%	2.04%	2.36%	2.02%	1.86%	2.28%	1.15%	2.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLEU and FLSW in my portfolio?

FLEU and FLSW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLEU or FLSW?

FLEU has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to FLSW (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs FLSW's -28.16%.

Which ETF is better, FLEU or FLSW?

On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 11.75% vs 7.06% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLEU or FLSW?

Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLEU or FLSW?

FLEU and FLSW have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLEU or FLSW?

FLEU has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.12% for FLSW.

What is the main difference between FLEU and FLSW?

FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.