PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEH vs. EWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEH vs. EWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEH achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than EWO's 14.52% return.


FLEH

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.88%
YTD
6.27%
6M
9.17%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*

EWO

1D
-1.79%
1M
5.62%
YTD
14.52%
6M
21.29%
1Y
43.71%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
14.75%
10Y*
14.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEH vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEH
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF
6.27%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
14.52%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEH and EWO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.67

The correlation between FLEH and EWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLEH vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEH
EWO

Financial Services

16.0%
46.6%

Industrials

15.3%
14.2%

Healthcare

14.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
1.9%

Technology

7.5%
6.6%

Basic Materials

6.8%
8.1%

Energy

5.5%
10.8%

Utilities

4.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Real Estate

1.3%
4.4%

Financial Services

FLEH
16.0%
EWO
46.6%

Industrials

FLEH
15.3%
EWO
14.2%

Healthcare

FLEH
14.8%
EWO

-

Consumer Defensive

FLEH
12.1%
EWO

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLEH
10.8%
EWO
1.9%

Technology

FLEH
7.5%
EWO
6.6%

Basic Materials

FLEH
6.8%
EWO
8.1%

Energy

FLEH
5.5%
EWO
10.8%

Utilities

FLEH
4.0%
EWO
7.5%

Communication Services

FLEH
3.4%
EWO

-

Real Estate

FLEH
1.3%
EWO
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEH vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEH
FLEH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEH Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEH vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEHEWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.12

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

10.58

-5.59

FLEH vs. EWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEH Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the EWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEH and EWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLEHEWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.38

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.27

+0.29

Drawdowns

FLEH vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEH drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEH and EWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEHEWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-75.69%

+41.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-14.08%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-16.75%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-41.82%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.79%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-28.12%

+23.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

4.14%

-0.46%

Volatility

FLEH vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEHEWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

15.08%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

18.52%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

21.84%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

22.86%

-4.61%

FLEH vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEH vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison

FLEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, which matches EWO's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
2.08%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%
FLEH
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF
2.09%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLEH and EWO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLEH has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to EWO (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEH dropped -33.94% vs EWO's -75.69%.

On 5-year performance, EWO leads with 14.75% vs 11.81% for FLEH. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.75% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWO.

FLEH and EWO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.09%.

FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEH and 0.49% for EWO.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEH and EWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer