PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEE vs. EWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEE vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEE achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 18.09% return.


FLEE

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.47%
YTD
5.58%
6M
8.37%
1Y
17.27%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*

EWN

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.09%
6M
18.14%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEE vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
5.58%35.76%2.03%20.46%-15.22%16.84%5.33%24.41%-14.97%1.47%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.09%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEE and EWN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.86

The correlation between FLEE and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLEE vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEE
EWN

Financial Services

23.8%
18.1%

Industrials

19.6%
10.2%

Healthcare

12.8%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
11.5%

Technology

8.5%
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
1.5%

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.1%

Energy

5.3%
2.1%

Utilities

5.1%

-

Communication Services

3.0%
14.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.7%

Financial Services

FLEE
23.8%
EWN
18.1%

Industrials

FLEE
19.6%
EWN
10.2%

Healthcare

FLEE
12.8%
EWN
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLEE
8.5%
EWN
11.5%

Technology

FLEE
8.5%
EWN
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLEE
6.6%
EWN
1.5%

Basic Materials

FLEE
5.8%
EWN
3.1%

Energy

FLEE
5.3%
EWN
2.1%

Utilities

FLEE
5.1%
EWN

-

Communication Services

FLEE
3.0%
EWN
14.7%

Real Estate

FLEE
1.1%
EWN
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEE vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEE
FLEE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEE vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEEEWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.57

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

9.70

-4.57

FLEE vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEE and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLEEEWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.73

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.31

+0.13

Drawdowns

FLEE vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEE drawdown since its inception was -37.27%, smaller than the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEE and EWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEEEWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.27%

-65.22%

+27.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-13.24%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-19.77%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.62%

-43.57%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-1.30%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-16.35%

+9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.49%

-0.11%

Volatility

FLEE vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) is 5.78%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that FLEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEEEWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

7.50%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

16.37%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

19.68%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

22.88%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

21.36%

-2.41%

FLEE vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEE vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

FLEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than EWN's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.26%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
2.61%2.76%3.93%2.57%3.48%3.61%1.88%3.02%3.85%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLEE and EWN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to FLEE (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEE dropped -37.27% vs EWN's -65.22%.

On 5-year performance, EWN leads with 8.69% vs 8.65% for FLEE. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEE has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWN has performed better with a 8.69% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 2.61% for FLEE.

FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEE and 0.50% for EWN.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEE and EWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer