FLDR vs. NIXT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) and NIXT (Research Affiliates Deletions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index, while NIXT is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Research Affiliates Deletions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLDR returned 4.74% vs 32.16% for NIXT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLDR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for NIXT.

Performance

FLDR vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 20.40% return.

FLDR

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 5.36%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

NIXT

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 20.40%
• 6M: 17.28%
• 1Y: 32.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDR vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	1.58%	5.41%	1.00%
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF	20.40%	4.94%	4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDR and NIXT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.17

Return for Risk

FLDR vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR

FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

NIXT

NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 54
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDR vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLDR	NIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.90	1.52	+4.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.99	2.24	+7.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.73	1.26	+1.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.19	2.76	+7.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	69.63	9.35	+60.28

FLDR vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDR Sharpe Ratio is 5.90, which is higher than the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDR and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLDR vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum NIXT drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and NIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDR	NIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-27.75%	+15.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.47%	-11.71%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.62%	+0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-5.89%	+5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	3.46%	-3.39%

Volatility

FLDR vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.20%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDR	NIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	5.32%	-5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.59%	14.26%	-13.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81%	21.30%	-20.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.21%	23.23%	-22.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.25%	23.23%	-17.98%

FLDR vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLDR vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than NIXT's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	4.42%	4.66%	5.50%	5.28%	2.09%	0.51%	1.22%	2.69%	1.38%
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF	1.33%	1.64%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDR and NIXT in my portfolio?

FLDR and NIXT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDR or NIXT?

NIXT has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to FLDR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

Which ETF is better, FLDR or NIXT?

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 32.16% vs 4.74% for FLDR. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLDR or NIXT?

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 32.16% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDR or NIXT?

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDR or NIXT?

FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 1.33% for NIXT.

What is the main difference between FLDR and NIXT?

FLDR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while NIXT is Mid Cap Value Equities. FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLDR and 0.09% for NIXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.90 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.