PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDR vs. LX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLDR vs. LX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than LX's -31.09% return.


FLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*

LX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
-31.09%
6M
-31.51%
1Y
-68.23%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
-25.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDR vs. LX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.37%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
-31.09%-40.97%242.61%6.40%-50.78%-42.39%-51.76%91.59%-53.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDR and LX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLDR vs. LX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LX
LX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
LX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
LX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
LX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDR vs. LX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.70

0.76

+1.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.04

-0.95

+10.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

68.61

-1.38

+69.98

FLDR vs. LX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDR Sharpe Ratio is 5.83, which is higher than the LX Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDR and LX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83

-1.07

+6.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.05

-0.35

+3.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.04

+0.58

Drawdowns

FLDR vs. LX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum LX drawdown of -93.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and LX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-93.19%

+80.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.47%

-72.18%

+71.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-81.04%

+80.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

-90.23%

+87.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-85.24%

+85.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-63.32%

+62.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

49.57%

-49.50%

Volatility

FLDR vs. LX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.19%, while LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a volatility of 22.74%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLDRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

22.74%

-22.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

36.53%

-35.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81%

63.97%

-63.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.21%

73.71%

-72.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

323.46%

-318.20%

Dividends

FLDR vs. LX - Dividend Comparison

FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than LX's 18.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.43%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
18.45%9.30%2.38%11.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLDR and LX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LX has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs LX's -93.19%.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLDR and LX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer