PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDR vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLDR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLDR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
0.65%5.41%5.49%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
-22.56%-6.56%99.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -22.56% return.


FLDR

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.86%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
1.97%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-22.56%
6M
-40.86%
1Y
-17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLDR vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLDR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDRFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.59

-0.40

+4.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.89

-0.29

+7.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.22

0.97

+1.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.98

-0.39

+6.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.24

-0.84

+32.07

FLDR vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDR Sharpe Ratio is 4.59, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDR and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDRFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59

-0.40

+4.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.35

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between FLDR and FBTC is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLDR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.54%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLDR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and FBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDRFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-49.33%

+37.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-49.33%

+48.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-46.06%

+45.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-14.12%

+13.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

23.05%

-22.91%

Volatility

FLDR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.42%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLDRFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

12.97%

-12.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.56%

36.77%

-36.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98%

45.30%

-44.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.21%

51.21%

-50.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

51.21%

-45.89%