FLDOX vs. DGIFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLDOX (Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund) and DGIFX (Disciplined Growth Investors Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FLDOX returned 7.57%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for DGIFX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLDOX charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DGIFX.

Performance

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDOX achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FLDOX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.

FLDOX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 16.24%
• 3Y*: 13.03%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

DGIFX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 6.56%
• YTD: 17.45%
• 6M: 16.09%
• 1Y: 25.48%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 10.48%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLDOX Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund	6.42%	10.49%	14.05%	10.91%	-10.73%	8.74%	5.56%	11.13%	-2.59%	15.99%
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	17.45%	3.54%	21.13%	33.10%	-18.35%	9.59%	24.07%	23.97%	-2.39%	14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDOX and DGIFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.79

The correlation between FLDOX and DGIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLDOX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDOX

FLDOX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FLDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FLDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FLDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FLDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

DGIFX

DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 38
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLDOX	DGIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.80	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.50	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.55	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	7.92	+4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDOX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLDOX	DGIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	1.80	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.50	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.67	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.71	+0.16

Drawdowns

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDOX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum DGIFX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDOX and DGIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDOX	DGIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.13%	-30.93%	+12.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.79%	-10.91%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.56%	-30.93%	+22.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.13%	-30.93%	+12.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.13%	-30.93%	+12.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-5.90%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	3.50%	-2.15%

Volatility

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) is 2.29%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that FLDOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDOX	DGIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	4.23%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.62%	11.14%	-5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.03%	15.47%	-8.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.25%	21.11%	-12.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.55%	18.66%	-10.11%

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDOX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDOX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

FLDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than DGIFX's 7.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	7.02%	8.29%	20.95%	2.78%	2.21%	11.12%	10.09%	3.53%	3.74%	4.29%	0.00%
FLDOX Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund	3.40%	3.61%	10.96%	2.38%	2.83%	6.41%	1.04%	1.61%	4.82%	4.00%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDOX and DGIFX in my portfolio?

FLDOX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDOX or DGIFX?

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FLDOX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDOX dropped -18.13% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.