PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDOX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDOX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 2.49% return.


FLDOX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.22%
6M
4.30%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
12.36%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
7.04%
ALL TIME*
7.60%

BWBIX

1D
1.88%
1M
-3.81%
6M
4.61%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDOX
Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund
6.31%10.49%14.05%10.91%-10.73%8.74%5.56%11.13%-2.67%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
2.49%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDOX and BWBIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

0.81

The correlation between FLDOX and BWBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLDOX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLDOX
FLDOX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FLDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLDOXBWBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.99

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

3.03

+6.44

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDOX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDOX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDOX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDOXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.13%

-39.14%

+21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.79%

-11.65%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.56%

-21.59%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-39.14%

+21.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-4.30%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-11.54%

+7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

3.81%

-2.42%

Volatility

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) is 2.18%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that FLDOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLDOXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

4.64%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.22%

12.31%

-6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

16.16%

-8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.35%

21.33%

-12.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

23.09%

-14.76%

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDOX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLDOX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

FLDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than BWBIX's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.42%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%0.00%
FLDOX
Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund
3.46%3.61%10.96%2.38%2.83%6.41%1.04%1.61%4.82%4.00%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLDOX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FLDOX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDOX dropped -18.13% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

FLDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLDOX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer