FLDB vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLDB returned 4.16% vs 61.61% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. FLDB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

FLDB vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDB achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 16.12% return.

FLDB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 15.17%
• 1Y: 61.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDB vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	1.57%	2.87%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	16.12%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDB and BESF is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

FLDB vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 84
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDB vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLDB	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.54	2.52	+2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.14	3.34	+4.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.07	1.41	+0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.90	5.64	+19.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	91.30	15.57	+75.73

FLDB vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDB Sharpe Ratio is 4.54, which is higher than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDB and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLDB vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDB drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDB and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDB	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-10.97%	+10.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-10.97%	+10.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-8.73%	+8.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-2.74%	+2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	3.97%	-3.92%

Volatility

FLDB vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) is 0.36%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that FLDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDB	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	6.97%	-6.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.64%	14.93%	-14.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92%	24.75%	-23.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.31%	24.39%	-23.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.31%	24.39%	-23.08%

FLDB vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDB vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

FLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than BESF's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.86%	6.39%	0.00%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.44%	4.72%	3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDB and BESF in my portfolio?

FLDB and BESF have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDB or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to FLDB (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDB dropped -0.49% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, FLDB or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 61.61% vs 4.16% for FLDB. On fees, FLDB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FLDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLDB or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 61.61% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDB or BESF?

FLDB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDB or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 4.44% for FLDB.

What is the main difference between FLDB and BESF?

FLDB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FLDB and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.