PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDAX vs. FKINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund (FLDAX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDAX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than FKINX's 4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FLDAX has underperformed FKINX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while FKINX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.


FLDAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.85%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
2.30%

FKINX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
4.34%
6M
4.34%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLDAX
Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund
0.49%5.30%4.79%5.34%-4.40%0.91%3.04%4.79%0.60%1.22%
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
4.34%12.24%7.12%8.65%-5.29%17.21%3.57%15.75%-5.54%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDAX and FKINX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2004

0.23

The correlation between FLDAX and FKINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLDAX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDAX
FLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FKINX
FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund (FLDAX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLDAXFKINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.79

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

15.24

-3.70

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDAX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDAX drawdown since its inception was -12.84%, smaller than the maximum FKINX drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDAX and FKINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDAXFKINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-43.18%

+30.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-3.43%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.22%

-7.42%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.72%

-13.20%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.84%

-23.91%

+11.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.17%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.67%

-3.71%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.85%

-0.55%

Volatility

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund (FLDAX) is 0.57%, while Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that FLDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLDAXFKINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

1.70%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

3.86%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

5.56%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

7.88%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.61%

9.26%

-6.65%

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLDAX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

FLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than FKINX's 5.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
5.57%5.58%5.59%5.52%5.22%6.52%5.22%5.11%5.34%5.04%5.19%5.71%
FLDAX
Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund
4.25%4.26%4.32%3.69%3.33%2.39%2.94%3.74%3.01%1.84%1.71%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLDAX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKINX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to FLDAX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDAX dropped -12.84% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLDAX and FKINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer