FLCV vs. SEIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLCV returned 22.99% vs 44.72% for SEIV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCV charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.

Performance

FLCV vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCV achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 18.28% return.

FLCV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEIV

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 10.69%
• YTD: 18.28%
• 6M: 21.23%
• 1Y: 44.72%
• 3Y*: 27.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCV vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	12.98%	15.64%	6.56%
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF	18.28%	27.43%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCV and SEIV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024	0.88

The correlation between FLCV and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCV vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCV	SEIV
Financial Services	18.3%	23.0%
Technology	16.1%	17.0%
Industrials	12.9%	3.0%
Healthcare	11.8%	18.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	18.5%
Communication Services	7.7%	6.5%
Energy	6.9%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	3.9%
Utilities	4.2%	2.4%
Basic Materials	4.0%	5.1%
Real Estate	3.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FLCV vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCV

FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 93
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCV vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCV	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	3.60	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	4.91	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.64	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	6.47	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	26.41	-11.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCV vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCV and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCV	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	3.60	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	1.23	+0.10

Drawdowns

FLCV vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and SEIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCV	SEIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-18.18%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-6.95%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.85%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-3.48%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	1.70%	-0.18%

Volatility

FLCV vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is 2.66%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that FLCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCV	SEIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	4.10%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	9.08%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	12.49%	-1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	16.68%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	16.68%	-1.73%

FLCV vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCV vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SEIV's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	0.73%	0.83%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF	1.34%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCV and SEIV in my portfolio?

FLCV and SEIV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCV or SEIV?

SEIV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to FLCV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCV dropped -15.93% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

Which ETF is better, FLCV or SEIV?

On 1-year performance, SEIV leads with 44.72% vs 22.99% for FLCV. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCV or SEIV?

Over the 1-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 44.72% return vs 22.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCV or SEIV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for FLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCV or SEIV?

SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.73% for FLCV.

What is the main difference between FLCV and SEIV?

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for FLCV and 0.15% for SEIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.