FLCV vs. KWIN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FLCV is actively managed, while KWIN is passively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLCV charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.

Performance

FLCV vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 2.05% return.

FLCV

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.24%
• 6M: 14.98%
• YTD: 18.87%
• 1Y: 26.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.70%

KWIN

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	$2.44M	$1.83M	$941.78K
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	$349.84K	$511.88K	$448.46K

FLCV vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	18.87%	5.21%
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	2.05%	0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCV and KWIN is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

FLCV vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCV

FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 91
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

KWIN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCV vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCV	KWIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.56	—	—

Drawdowns

FLCV vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and KWIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCV	KWIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-1.58%	-14.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.00%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-0.33%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLCV	KWIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.53%	4.04%	+7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.68%	4.04%	+10.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	4.04%	+10.64%

FLCV vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCV vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison

FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	0.69%	0.83%	0.24%
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCV and KWIN in my portfolio?

FLCV and KWIN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCV or KWIN?

On fees, FLCV is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCV or KWIN?

FLCV is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCV or KWIN?

FLCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.

What is the main difference between FLCV and KWIN?

They also come from different issuers: Federated and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for FLCV and 0.51% for KWIN.