FLCSX vs. MMUFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCSX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund) and MMUFX (MFS Utilities Fund) are both mutual funds - FLCSX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MMUFX is a Utilities Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX returned 15.32%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for MMUFX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCSX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MMUFX.

Performance

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCSX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than MMUFX's 4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX has outperformed MMUFX with an annualized return of 15.32%, while MMUFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return.

FLCSX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 30.76%
• 3Y*: 25.44%
• 5Y*: 15.93%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

MMUFX

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 12.60%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	9.75%	27.49%	26.31%	23.51%	-8.02%	25.80%	9.05%	31.59%	-13.62%	17.86%
MMUFX MFS Utilities Fund	4.90%	14.32%	11.38%	-2.28%	0.35%	13.86%	6.04%	24.91%	0.85%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCSX and MMUFX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 1995	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FLCSX and MMUFX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FLCSX vs. MMUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCSX

FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

MMUFX

MMUFX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MMUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MMUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MMUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MMUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MMUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCSX	MMUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	0.89	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	1.29	+2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.16	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	1.46	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.16	3.89	+11.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the MMUFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCSX and MMUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCSX	MMUFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	0.89	+1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	0.47	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.51	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.63	-0.13

Drawdowns

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCSX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than MMUFX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCSX and MMUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCSX	MMUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.67%	-56.03%	-7.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-8.75%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.82%	-17.72%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.69%	-21.64%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.11%	-35.82%	-1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-7.07%	+6.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	-8.75%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	3.27%	-1.19%

Volatility

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) is 2.86%, while MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FLCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCSX	MMUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	5.49%	-2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	11.64%	-2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	14.28%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	15.81%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	16.64%	+2.02%

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MMUFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCSX vs. MMUFX - Dividend Comparison

FLCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than MMUFX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	5.92%	6.50%	4.26%	2.83%	3.07%	4.71%	3.93%	5.43%	7.63%	3.25%	3.61%	4.55%
MMUFX MFS Utilities Fund	3.65%	3.83%	3.72%	5.82%	8.68%	5.61%	5.80%	6.85%	4.29%	2.67%	3.72%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCSX and MMUFX in my portfolio?

FLCSX and MMUFX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCSX or MMUFX?

MMUFX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FLCSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCSX dropped -63.67% vs MMUFX's -56.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.