FLCPX vs. TAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX).
FLCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2016. TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984.
Performance
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -10.79% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCPX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's -10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCPX has outperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 13.75%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.
FLCPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
TAGRX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -10.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCPX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FLCPX
TAGRX
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCPX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.27 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 0.51 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.07 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.16 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 0.57 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCPX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.27 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.34 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.55 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.45 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCPX and TAGRX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison
FLCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than TAGRX's 13.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.60% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.55% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCPX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCPX and TAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCPX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -58.45% | +24.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -14.04% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.40% | -29.10% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -36.96% | +3.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -14.04% | +5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -11.57% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 4.06% | -1.50% |
Volatility
FLCPX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCPX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 4.09% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 9.70% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 18.74% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 20.18% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 20.49% | -2.37% |