FLCKX vs. YFSIX
FLCKX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FLCKX returned 14.17%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCKX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCKX achieves a 21.37% return, which is significantly higher than YFSIX's 18.36% return.
FLCKX
- 1D
- -4.46%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 35.45%
- 3Y*
- 27.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
YFSIX
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 18.36%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K | 21.37% | 20.45% | 27.06% | 26.21% | -22.91% | 26.19% | 26.85% | 35.76% | -16.34% | 15.51% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 18.36% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCKX and YFSIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FLCKX and YFSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCKX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
FLCKX
YFSIX
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCKX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 1.33 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.76 | 4.10 | +6.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCKX drawdown since its inception was -69.99%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCKX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCKX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.99% | -35.10% | -34.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -14.20% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.52% | -14.20% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.52% | -25.14% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -7.71% | +3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.38% | -4.89% | -7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 4.56% | -0.98% |
Volatility
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a higher volatility of 10.36% compared to AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) at 7.23%. This indicates that FLCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCKX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.36% | 7.23% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 15.29% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.72% | 22.16% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 15.63% | +7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 16.33% | +7.16% |
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCKX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
FLCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K | 3.86% | 4.69% | 14.54% | 12.22% | 18.51% | 8.45% | 0.19% | 0.14% | 19.95% | 18.97% | 27.57% | 6.18% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCKX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCKX has higher volatility (10.36%) compared to YFSIX (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCKX dropped -69.99% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
FLCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCKX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer