FLCH vs. FLBL
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL).
FLCH and FLBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. FLBL is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 30, 2018.
Performance
FLCH vs. FLBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCH vs. FLBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -22.83% |
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF | -0.69% | 3.59% | 8.26% | 14.83% | -2.69% | 4.35% | 2.17% | 7.67% | -1.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLBL's -0.69% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
FLBL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCH vs. FLBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FLBL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. FLBL — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
FLBL
FLCH vs. FLBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.64 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 0.93 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 0.79 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 2.63 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.64 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 1.35 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.77 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and FLBL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLCH vs. FLBL - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FLBL's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF | 7.46% | 7.24% | 8.05% | 8.37% | 5.53% | 3.57% | 3.22% | 3.97% | 2.21% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. FLBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than FLBL's maximum drawdown of -19.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and FLBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -19.52% | -42.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.65% | -3.26% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.06% | -6.80% | -49.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | -1.49% | -32.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | -1.01% | -29.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 1.00% | +5.02% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. FLBL - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) at 1.11%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 1.11% | +5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 2.23% | +11.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 4.29% | +18.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 3.88% | +25.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 5.77% | +22.29% |