FLCGX vs. CISMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX).
FLCGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Mar 20, 1985. CISMX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Sep 15, 2015.
Performance
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCGX Meeder Quantex Fund | -3.60% | 19.10% | 36.38% | 14.81% | -13.77% | 27.27% | -5.36% | 18.48% | -12.35% | 13.42% |
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | -2.54% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCGX achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly lower than CISMX's -2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCGX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.07% annualized return.
FLCGX
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
CISMX
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- -5.23%
- 3Y*
- -0.23%
- 5Y*
- -1.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCGX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCGX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank
FLCGX
CISMX
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCGX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | -0.25 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | -0.24 | +1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.97 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | -0.43 | +1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | -1.04 | +8.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCGX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | -0.25 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.08 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCGX and CISMX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison
FLCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than CISMX's 4.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCGX Meeder Quantex Fund | 8.75% | 8.48% | 39.58% | 1.17% | 2.73% | 16.70% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 2.92% | 2.00% | 17.06% |
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.77% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCGX drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCGX and CISMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCGX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.94% | -33.80% | -33.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -11.26% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.83% | -21.19% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.45% | -33.80% | -16.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.25% | -16.58% | +10.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -6.55% | -6.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 4.70% | -2.18% |
Volatility
FLCGX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) have volatilities of 5.71% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCGX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.49% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 12.64% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 19.91% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 17.39% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 18.22% | +5.31% |