PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCE vs. UNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCE vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCE achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 5.40% return.


FLCE

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.57%
YTD
8.81%
6M
8.78%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UNOV

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.17%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.64%
1Y
13.88%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCE vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLCE and UNOV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.92

The correlation between FLCE and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCE vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCE
FLCE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FLCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCE vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCEUNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.51

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.08

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

15.01

-3.35

FLCE vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCE Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCE and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCEUNOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.50

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.91

+0.08

Drawdowns

FLCE vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCE drawdown since its inception was -17.52%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCE and UNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCEUNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-13.84%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-4.52%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.22%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-1.66%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

0.93%

+1.07%

Volatility

FLCE vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.14%. This indicates that FLCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCEUNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.14%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

4.67%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

5.58%

+5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

6.83%

+9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

7.72%

+8.35%

FLCE vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCE vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

FLCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FLCE and UNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCE has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to UNOV (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCE dropped -17.52% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

On 1-year performance, FLCE leads with 23.25% vs 13.88% for UNOV. On fees, UNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLCE has performed better with a 23.25% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FLCE.

FLCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FLCE and 0.79% for UNOV.

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCE and UNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer