FLCE vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCE (Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Frontier, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

FLCE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCE achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.

FLCE

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 8.81%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 23.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLCE Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	8.81%	11.34%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCE and BUFH is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

FLCE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCE

FLCE Risk / Return Rank: 61
FLCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FLCE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FLCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FLCE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	2.91	-1.92

Drawdowns

FLCE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCE drawdown since its inception was -17.52%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCE and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCE	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.52%	-1.53%	-15.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.05%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-0.18%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLCE	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.41%	2.37%	+9.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	2.37%	+13.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	2.37%	+13.70%

FLCE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

FLCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCE Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.30%	0.32%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCE and BUFH in my portfolio?

FLCE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCE or BUFH?

On fees, FLCE is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCE or BUFH?

FLCE is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCE or BUFH?

FLCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between FLCE and BUFH?

FLCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FLCE and 0.95% for BUFH.