FLCC vs. TEXN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FLCC is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. Over the past year, FLCC returned 16.53% vs 27.14% for TEXN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.

Performance

FLCC vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 20.04% return.

FLCC

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: 7.70%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 1Y: 16.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TEXN

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.85%
• 6M: 15.73%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	9.53%	11.32%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	20.04%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and TEXN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.54

The correlation between FLCC and TEXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCC vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCC	TEXN
Technology	39.3%	20.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	11.6%
Financial Services	10.1%	3.9%
Healthcare	9.6%	2.7%
Communication Services	9.3%	3.3%
Industrials	8.9%	16.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	2.1%
Energy	2.5%	32.3%
Basic Materials	2.0%	0.7%
Utilities	1.4%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.2%	3.9%

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 45
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

TEXN

TEXN Risk / Return Rank: 78
TEXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TEXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TEXN Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TEXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TEXN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCC	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.88	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.66	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	4.20	-2.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.88	12.70	-5.82

FLCC vs. TEXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the TEXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and TEXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and TEXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	TEXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-6.48%	-12.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-6.48%	-2.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-4.90%	+4.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.33%	-1.44%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.14%	+0.27%

Volatility

FLCC vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) is 3.37%, while iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that FLCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	TEXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	3.97%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	10.17%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	14.54%	-1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	14.48%	+2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	14.48%	+2.73%

FLCC vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCC vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than TEXN's 1.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.20%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.40%	0.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCC and TEXN in my portfolio?

FLCC and TEXN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCC or TEXN?

TEXN has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to FLCC (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCC dropped -19.18% vs TEXN's -6.48%.

Which ETF is better, FLCC or TEXN?

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 27.14% vs 16.53% for FLCC. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FLCC has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCC or TEXN?

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 27.14% return vs 16.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCC or TEXN?

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCC or TEXN?

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.46% for FLCC.

What is the main difference between FLCC and TEXN?

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 0.20% for TEXN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.