FLCC vs. FTRB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and FTRB (Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FTRB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLCC returned 18.21% vs 2.46% for FTRB. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FTRB.

Performance

FLCC vs. FTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than FTRB's -0.51% return.

FLCC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 10.65%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 18.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.95%

FTRB

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: -0.65%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 1Y: 2.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	$1.19M	$831.18K	$771.14K
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	$3.86M	$3.02M	$2.96M

FLCC vs. FTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	10.61%	16.61%	9.68%
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	-0.51%	7.60%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and FTRB is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.15

The correlation between FLCC and FTRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. FTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 50
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FTRB

FTRB Risk / Return Rank: 34
FTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCC vs. FTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCC	FTRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.91	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.32	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.16	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.14	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	2.96	+3.81

FLCC vs. FTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the FTRB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and FTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. FTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, which is greater than FTRB's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and FTRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	FTRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-4.83%	-14.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-2.80%	-6.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.15%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-1.30%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.08%	+1.32%

Volatility

FLCC vs. FTRB - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) at 0.86%. This indicates that FLCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	FTRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	0.86%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	2.78%	+7.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	3.52%	+9.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	4.49%	+12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	4.49%	+12.58%

FLCC vs. FTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCC vs. FTRB - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FTRB's 4.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.20%
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	4.40%	4.46%	4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCC and FTRB in my portfolio?

FLCC and FTRB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCC or FTRB?

FLCC has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FTRB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCC dropped -19.18% vs FTRB's -4.83%.

Which ETF is better, FLCC or FTRB?

On 1-year performance, FLCC leads with 18.21% vs 2.46% for FTRB. On fees, FLCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FTRB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCC or FTRB?

Over the 1-year period, FLCC has performed better with a 18.21% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCC or FTRB?

FLCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FTRB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCC or FTRB?

FTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.46% for FLCC.

What is the main difference between FLCC and FTRB?

FLCC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FTRB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 0.39% for FTRB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.