PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCB vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCB vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCB achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.90% return.


FLCB

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.52%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.74%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.90%
6M
14.14%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCB vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
0.41%6.95%1.59%5.72%-13.54%-1.73%7.66%0.75%
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
11.90%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCB and LVHI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.06

The correlation between FLCB and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCB vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCB
LVHI

Financial Services

2.6%
23.6%

Healthcare

1.1%
7.4%

Energy

0.7%
17.4%

Communication Services

0.6%
5.8%

Utilities

0.4%
10.4%

Industrials

0.4%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
8.7%

Technology

0.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

0.1%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

FLCB
2.6%
LVHI
23.6%

Healthcare

FLCB
1.1%
LVHI
7.4%

Energy

FLCB
0.7%
LVHI
17.4%

Communication Services

FLCB
0.6%
LVHI
5.8%

Utilities

FLCB
0.4%
LVHI
10.4%

Industrials

FLCB
0.4%
LVHI
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLCB
0.2%
LVHI
8.7%

Technology

FLCB
0.1%
LVHI
0.1%

Basic Materials

FLCB
0.1%
LVHI
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCB

-

LVHI
5.3%

Real Estate

FLCB

-

LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCB vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCB
FLCB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCB vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCBLVHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

3.18

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

4.36

-2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.60

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

5.01

-3.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.46

20.95

-15.49

FLCB vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCB and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCBLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

3.18

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

1.44

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.82

-0.65

Drawdowns

FLCB vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCB drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCB and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCBLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-32.31%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-6.08%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

-11.99%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-11.99%

-6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-1.39%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-3.52%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.45%

-0.52%

Volatility

FLCB vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) is 1.27%, while Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that FLCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCBLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

3.30%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

7.51%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

9.45%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

11.06%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

13.76%

-8.25%

FLCB vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCB vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FLCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than LVHI's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
4.30%4.19%4.10%3.40%2.73%2.28%3.24%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
4.49%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCB and LVHI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHI has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FLCB (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCB dropped -18.82% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.87% vs 0.07% for FLCB. On fees, FLCB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 4.30% for FLCB.

FLCB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLCB and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCB and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer