FLCB vs. DIVI
FLCB (Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCB returned 0.07%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for DIVI. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FLCB vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCB achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 11.74% return.
FLCB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCB vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | 0.41% | 6.95% | 1.59% | 5.72% | -13.54% | -1.73% | 7.66% | 0.75% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.74% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCB and DIVI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, FLCB and DIVI have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FLCB vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCB
DIVI
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLCB
DIVI
Healthcare
FLCB
DIVI
Energy
FLCB
DIVI
Communication Services
FLCB
DIVI
Utilities
FLCB
DIVI
Industrials
FLCB
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLCB
DIVI
Technology
FLCB
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLCB
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLCB
-
DIVI
Real Estate
FLCB
-
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCB vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLCB
DIVI
FLCB vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.81 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 2.53 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.64 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 10.17 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.81 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.91 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.67 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
FLCB vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCB drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, smaller than the maximum DIVI drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCB and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -27.76% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -10.54% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.16% | -14.58% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.48% | -18.53% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -0.25% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -3.63% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 2.73% | -1.80% |
Volatility
FLCB vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) is 1.27%, while Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that FLCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 5.28% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 12.16% | -9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 14.84% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 15.29% | -9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 16.46% | -10.95% |
FLCB vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCB vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than DIVI's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.50% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.19% | 4.10% | 3.40% | 2.73% | 2.28% | 3.24% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCB and DIVI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVI has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to FLCB (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCB dropped -18.82% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.83% vs 0.07% for FLCB. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLCB.
FLCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.50% for DIVI.
FLCB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLCB and 0.09% for DIVI.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCB and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer