FLCB vs. AFIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF).
FLCB and AFIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCB is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 19, 2019. AFIF is an actively managed fund by Regents Park Funds. It was launched on Sep 18, 2018.
Performance
FLCB vs. AFIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCB vs. AFIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | 0.05% | 6.95% | 1.59% | 5.72% | -13.54% | -1.73% | 7.66% | 0.75% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | -0.17% | 6.56% | 7.06% | 9.73% | -5.38% | -0.50% | 2.14% | 0.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCB achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than AFIF's -0.17% return.
FLCB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
AFIF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCB vs. AFIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AFIF's 1.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCB vs. AFIF — Risk / Return Rank
FLCB
AFIF
FLCB vs. AFIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCB | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.40 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.94 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.73 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 11.45 | -6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCB | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.40 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.74 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.40 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCB and AFIF is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLCB vs. AFIF - Dividend Comparison
FLCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than AFIF's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.19% | 4.10% | 3.40% | 2.73% | 2.28% | 3.24% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.70% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
FLCB vs. AFIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCB drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than AFIF's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCB and AFIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCB | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -10.29% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -1.79% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.48% | -8.85% | -9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -1.25% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -2.27% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.43% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FLCB vs. AFIF - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) at 1.25%. This indicates that FLCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCB | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 1.25% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.12% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 3.53% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 4.48% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 6.32% | -0.78% |