AFIF vs. LSST

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST).

AFIF and LSST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFIF is an actively managed fund by Regents Park Funds. It was launched on Sep 18, 2018. LSST is an actively managed fund by Groupe BPCE. It was launched on Dec 27, 2017.

Performance

AFIF vs. LSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AFIF vs. LSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	-0.17%	6.56%	7.06%	9.73%	-5.38%	-0.50%	2.14%	0.41%	-0.27%
LSST Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.76%	5.52%	-3.37%	-0.28%	5.54%	5.55%	0.43%

Returns By Period

AFIF

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.20%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 7.22%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: —

LSST

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIF vs. LSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than LSST's 0.38% expense ratio.

AFIF

Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF

LSST

Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF

Return for Risk

AFIF vs. LSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIF

AFIF Risk / Return Rank: 82
AFIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
AFIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AFIF Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AFIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AFIF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIF vs. LSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFIF	LSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFIF	LSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between AFIF and LSST is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AFIF vs. LSST - Dividend Comparison

AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while LSST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	3.70%	3.52%	5.61%	5.91%	3.49%	1.73%	1.25%	2.54%	0.69%
LSST Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	3.44%	3.85%	1.93%	2.73%	3.96%	2.70%	2.59%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFIF	LSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFIF	LSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.48%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	—	—