FLC vs. FIDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. FIDAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 14, 1996.
Performance
FLC vs. FIDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. FIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund | -9.90% | 12.05% | 30.09% | 5.01% | -14.17% | 28.80% | 1.58% | 31.21% | -15.30% | 11.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than FIDAX's -9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed FIDAX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while FIDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.43% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
FIDAX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -9.90%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- 1.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. FIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDAX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. FIDAX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
FIDAX
FLC vs. FIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | FIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.10 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.27 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.04 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.02 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 0.07 | +2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | FIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.10 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.29 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.43 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and FIDAX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. FIDAX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, less than FIDAX's 53.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund | 53.48% | 48.19% | 10.24% | 1.91% | 11.22% | 23.08% | 5.41% | 7.56% | 7.72% | 6.10% | 6.01% | 0.93% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. FIDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, which is greater than FIDAX's maximum drawdown of -70.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and FIDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | FIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -70.42% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -13.82% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -30.89% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -42.09% | -13.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -12.97% | +6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -14.12% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 4.89% | -2.63% |
Volatility
FLC vs. FIDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) is 4.25%, while John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that FLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | FIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.63% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 12.82% | -7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 20.58% | -9.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 20.71% | -6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 22.00% | +0.06% |