PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBR vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLBR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.63% return.


FLBR

1D
-0.32%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
12.86%
6M
14.02%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
12.86%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and YCS is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

-0.07

The correlation between FLBR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLBR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLBRYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.78

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

11.93

-7.15

FLBR vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBRYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.42%

-49.56%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-8.30%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-23.05%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-27.32%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.50%

-0.14%

-17.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.60%

-19.87%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.38%

2.65%

+3.73%

Volatility

FLBR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that FLBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLBRYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

2.25%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

12.19%

+7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.32%

16.93%

+8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.73%

21.10%

+6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.02%

18.82%

+14.20%

FLBR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLBR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
4.80%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLBR and YCS have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLBR has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.52% vs 4.58% for FLBR. On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.52% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

FLBR is categorized as Latin America Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLBR and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer