FLBDX vs. RPIEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLBDX (Meeder Tactical Income Fund) and RPIEX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX returned 3.18%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for RPIEX. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. FLBDX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for RPIEX.

Performance

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBDX achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than RPIEX's 2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX has outperformed RPIEX with an annualized return of 3.18%, while RPIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.

FLBDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 3.18%

RPIEX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 4.12%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 2.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	2.07%	7.28%	6.64%	7.10%	-5.71%	-2.01%	7.46%	7.24%	-1.67%	3.72%
RPIEX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund	2.75%	4.82%	6.83%	-4.51%	3.08%	0.08%	9.42%	-0.39%	0.89%	-1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBDX and RPIEX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	-0.22

The correlation between FLBDX and RPIEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (5 years) to -0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLBDX vs. RPIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBDX

FLBDX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FLBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FLBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

RPIEX

RPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 18
RPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLBDX	RPIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.32	1.14	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	1.92	+3.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.25	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	1.37	+3.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.19	4.59	+14.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the RPIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBDX and RPIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLBDX	RPIEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32	1.14	+2.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.23	0.38	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	0.55	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.58	+0.42

Drawdowns

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum RPIEX drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and RPIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBDX	RPIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-9.59%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-3.64%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.51%	-3.64%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.16%	-9.59%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.74%	-9.59%	+0.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.26%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-2.48%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	1.08%	-0.67%

Volatility

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) is 0.75%, while T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that FLBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBDX	RPIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	0.86%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	3.87%	-2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	4.36%	-1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.67%	4.92%	-2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.94%	4.19%	-1.25%

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIEX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLBDX vs. RPIEX - Dividend Comparison

FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than RPIEX's 7.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	4.58%	4.67%	4.35%	3.57%	1.68%	1.56%	1.81%	2.32%	2.03%	2.70%	2.90%	2.78%
RPIEX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund	7.55%	7.69%	6.32%	4.68%	15.28%	3.76%	1.93%	2.51%	4.36%	0.61%	2.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBDX and RPIEX in my portfolio?

FLBDX and RPIEX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLBDX or RPIEX?

RPIEX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to FLBDX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBDX dropped -8.74% vs RPIEX's -9.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.