FLBDX vs. EGRIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FLBDX (Meeder Tactical Income Fund) and EGRIX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX returned 3.19%/yr vs 6.56%/yr for EGRIX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLBDX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for EGRIX.

Performance

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBDX achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than EGRIX's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX has underperformed EGRIX with an annualized return of 3.19%, while EGRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.

FLBDX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: 3.20%
• 10Y*: 3.19%

EGRIX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 19.18%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: 6.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	2.28%	7.28%	6.64%	7.10%	-5.71%	-2.01%	7.46%	7.24%	-1.67%	3.72%
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund	7.53%	20.36%	9.50%	8.37%	-1.94%	3.66%	4.71%	14.80%	-8.34%	5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBDX and EGRIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2011	0.09

Over the past year, FLBDX and EGRIX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FLBDX vs. EGRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBDX

FLBDX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FLBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FLBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FLBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

EGRIX

EGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLBDX	EGRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	5.47	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.40	7.79	-3.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	2.46	-0.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	5.79	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.35	20.93	-3.58

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is lower than the EGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBDX and EGRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum EGRIX drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and EGRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBDX	EGRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-14.17%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-3.37%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.51%	-3.37%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.16%	-10.18%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.74%	-14.17%	+5.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.32%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-1.83%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.93%	-0.52%

Volatility

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that FLBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBDX	EGRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.79%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.92%	3.22%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50%	3.58%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.69%	4.04%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.94%	3.96%	-1.02%

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than EGRIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLBDX vs. EGRIX - Dividend Comparison

FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than EGRIX's 6.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund	6.19%	6.65%	6.00%	3.40%	4.82%	4.89%	5.82%	4.15%	0.06%	3.22%	1.78%	6.67%
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	4.57%	4.67%	4.35%	3.57%	1.68%	1.56%	1.81%	2.32%	2.03%	2.70%	2.90%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBDX and EGRIX in my portfolio?

FLBDX and EGRIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLBDX or EGRIX?

FLBDX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to EGRIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBDX dropped -8.74% vs EGRIX's -14.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.