FLAU vs. IND

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) and IND (Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLAU tracks the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index while IND tracks the Nifty 500 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLAU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IND.

Performance

FLAU vs. IND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF (IND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than IND's -7.00% return.

FLAU

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 12.18%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: —

IND

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: -7.00%
• 6M: -6.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAU vs. IND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	7.49%	4.50%
IND Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF	-7.00%	-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAU and IND is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

FLAU vs. IND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 24
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 28

IND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAU vs. IND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF (IND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLAU	IND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	—	—

Drawdowns

FLAU vs. IND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than IND's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and IND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLAU	IND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.73%	-18.75%	-26.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.73%	-8.20%	+2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-7.76%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLAU	IND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.17%	19.93%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.68%	19.93%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.56%	19.93%	+3.63%

FLAU vs. IND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IND's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLAU vs. IND - Dividend Comparison

FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than IND's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	1.72%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%
IND Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLAU and IND in my portfolio?

FLAU and IND have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLAU or IND?

On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLAU or IND?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLAU or IND?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.34% for IND.

What is the main difference between FLAU and IND?

FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while IND tracks Nifty 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 0.19% for IND.