FLAU vs. DBP
FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) and DBP (Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAU is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while DBP is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAU returned 6.14%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for DBP. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLAU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBP.
Performance
FLAU vs. DBP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than DBP's -3.82% return.
FLAU
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- —
DBP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
FLAU vs. DBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 11.38% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 11.00% | 23.38% | -10.17% | 1.89% |
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | -3.82% | 73.43% | 26.71% | 8.68% | -1.51% | -7.10% | 26.79% | 15.89% | -4.31% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAU and DBP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.28 |
The correlation between FLAU and DBP shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAU vs. DBP — Risk / Return Rank
FLAU
DBP
FLAU vs. DBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLAU | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.07 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 2.77 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLAU vs. DBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum DBP drawdown of -53.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and DBP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAU | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -53.89% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -30.03% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.03% | -30.03% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -30.03% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -27.52% | +25.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -25.42% | +18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 11.56% | -8.22% |
Volatility
FLAU vs. DBP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) is 5.83%, while Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that FLAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAU | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 9.06% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 30.70% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 33.35% | -16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 21.14% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 18.84% | +4.75% |
FLAU vs. DBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBP's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLAU vs. DBP - Dividend Comparison
FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than DBP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.53% | 2.44% | 4.21% | 4.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.12% |
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 2.92% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAU and DBP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBP has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to FLAU (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAU dropped -45.73% vs DBP's -53.89%.
On 5-year performance, DBP leads with 16.18% vs 6.14% for FLAU. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBP has performed better with a 16.18% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.
FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.53% for DBP.
FLAU is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DBP is Precious Metals. FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 0.78% for DBP.
DBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAU and DBP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer