FLAU vs. BND
FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAU is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAU returned 6.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLAU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
FLAU vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.52% return.
FLAU
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
FLAU vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 11.38% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 11.00% | 23.38% | -10.17% | 1.89% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.52% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAU and BND is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, FLAU and BND have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAU vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
FLAU
BND
FLAU vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLAU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.65 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 4.81 | -0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLAU vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -18.58% | -27.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -2.68% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.03% | -5.92% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -17.91% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -2.12% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -3.06% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 0.92% | +2.42% |
Volatility
FLAU vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.28%. This indicates that FLAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 1.28% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 2.74% | +11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 3.75% | +13.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 6.03% | +13.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 5.53% | +18.06% |
FLAU vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLAU vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 2.92% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAU and BND have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLAU has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAU dropped -45.73% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 5-year performance, FLAU leads with 6.14% vs 0.03% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLAU has performed better with a 6.14% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLAU.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.92% for FLAU.
FLAU is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 0.03% for BND.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAU and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer