PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAO vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAO vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAO achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 20.98% return.


FLAO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.88%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
1.80%
1M
17.25%
YTD
20.98%
6M
29.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAO vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLAO and NVDO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAO vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAO
FLAO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLAO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAO vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAONVDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

FLAO vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAONVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.39

-0.63

Drawdowns

FLAO vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAO and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAONVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-16.25%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.93%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-4.97%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

FLAO vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAONVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

31.91%

-26.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

31.91%

-24.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

31.91%

-24.41%

FLAO vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAO vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

FLAO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLAO and NVDO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLAO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLAO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.00% for FLAO.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FLAO and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAO and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer