PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAG vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAG vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders TOP 50 ETF (FLAG) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAG achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than USMV's 3.34% return.


FLAG

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.78%
6M
0.28%
YTD
1.09%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USMV

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.50%
6M
3.05%
YTD
3.34%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAG vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLAG and USMV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.81

The correlation between FLAG and USMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAG vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAG
FLAG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAG vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders TOP 50 ETF (FLAG) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLAGUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.11

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

0.84

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

2.75

-0.58

FLAG vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAG and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLAG vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAG drawdown since its inception was -9.29%, smaller than the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAG and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAGUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-33.10%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-6.46%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-1.78%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-2.86%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.98%

+0.79%

Volatility

FLAG vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders TOP 50 ETF (FLAG) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 3.01%. This indicates that FLAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAGUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.01%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

6.43%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

8.53%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.43%

12.38%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.43%

14.50%

-3.07%

FLAG vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAG vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

FLAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than USMV's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAG
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders TOP 50 ETF
2.04%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.49%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAG and USMV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAG has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to USMV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAG dropped -9.29% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 1-year performance, FLAG leads with 6.21% vs 5.52% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLAG has performed better with a 6.21% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLAG.

FLAG has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.49% for USMV.

FLAG tracks S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Market Leaders 50 Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLAG and 0.15% for USMV.

USMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAG and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer