PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAAX vs. FGNSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAAX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than FGNSX's 0.67% return.


FLAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.78%

FGNSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.67%
6M
0.94%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
1.11%2.78%2.58%6.52%-16.29%3.89%5.64%9.03%0.50%0.39%
FGNSX
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund
0.67%3.08%3.47%3.56%-0.36%0.14%1.04%2.11%1.47%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAAX and FGNSX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.46

The correlation between FLAAX and FGNSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAAX vs. FGNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAAX
FLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FGNSX
FGNSX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FGNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FGNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAAXFGNSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

3.00

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

7.47

-4.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.83

-1.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.18

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.40

3.02

+2.38

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FGNSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAAX and FGNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAAXFGNSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.00

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

1.05

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.10

-0.18

Drawdowns

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAAX drawdown since its inception was -21.01%, which is greater than FGNSX's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAAX and FGNSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAAXFGNSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-2.35%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-0.50%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-2.35%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-2.35%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

0.00%

-5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-0.25%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.92%

+0.12%

Volatility

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) at 0.40%. This indicates that FLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAAXFGNSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.40%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

0.69%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

1.02%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

2.06%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

1.65%

+3.01%

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FGNSX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAAX vs. FGNSX - Dividend Comparison

FLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than FGNSX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGNSX
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund
2.35%2.63%3.31%2.57%0.84%0.34%0.83%1.79%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
3.89%4.21%3.85%3.55%3.39%2.83%3.07%3.69%3.72%3.65%3.79%3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAAX and FGNSX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to FGNSX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAAX dropped -21.01% vs FGNSX's -2.35%.

FGNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAAX and FGNSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer