PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERH vs. GUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERH vs. GUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERH achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than GUT's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ERH has underperformed GUT with an annualized return of 6.59%, while GUT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.


ERH

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
3.55%
6M
4.43%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
6.59%

GUT

1D
0.63%
1M
2.57%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.19%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERH vs. GUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERH
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund
3.55%19.85%25.71%-10.52%-18.38%22.14%-1.15%33.97%-8.98%18.32%
GUT
The Gabelli Utility Trust
10.55%33.14%6.01%-21.07%-1.10%9.51%13.19%42.32%-7.87%22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ERH and GUT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2004

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERH vs. GUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERH
ERH Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ERH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ERH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GUT
GUT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERH vs. GUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERHGUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

4.38

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

14.52

-11.74

ERH vs. GUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERH Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the GUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERH and GUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERH vs. GUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERH drawdown since its inception was -69.81%, which is greater than GUT's maximum drawdown of -52.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERH and GUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERHGUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.81%

-52.79%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-5.40%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.24%

-30.63%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.85%

-33.94%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.11%

-42.21%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

0.00%

-6.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.27%

-8.50%

-8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

1.63%

+2.87%

Volatility

ERH vs. GUT - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) at 3.68%. This indicates that ERH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERHGUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

3.68%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

10.45%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

14.75%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

21.44%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

23.79%

-4.07%

ERH vs. GUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERH has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GUT's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERH vs. GUT - Dividend Comparison

ERH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, less than GUT's 9.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERH
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund
8.59%8.13%7.15%9.19%8.09%5.86%7.20%6.53%8.06%6.82%7.53%8.04%
GUT
The Gabelli Utility Trust
9.45%9.95%11.73%11.07%7.99%7.28%7.39%7.72%10.10%8.45%9.52%10.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERH and GUT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERH has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to GUT (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERH dropped -69.81% vs GUT's -52.79%.

GUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERH and GUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer