PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FKUD.L (First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist) and FEUZ.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares) are both Europe Equities funds from First Trust - FKUD.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while FEUZ.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FKUD.L returned 4.88%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for FEUZ.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FKUD.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FEUZ.L.

Performance

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKUD.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than FEUZ.L's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FKUD.L has underperformed FEUZ.L with an annualized return of 4.88%, while FEUZ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return.

FKUD.L

1D
0.38%
1M
3.49%
YTD
5.86%
6M
9.71%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
4.88%

FEUZ.L

1D
0.40%
1M
3.03%
YTD
12.51%
6M
15.50%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist		5.86%24.21%7.17%10.50%-17.38%16.72%-9.94%26.72%-14.67%10.05%
FEUZ.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares		12.51%48.45%3.89%9.28%-9.28%13.80%1.55%16.96%-15.00%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUD.L and FEUZ.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.60

The correlation between FKUD.L and FEUZ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FKUD.L
FEUZ.L

Financial Services

27.7%
10.6%

Basic Materials

17.8%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
9.2%

Industrials

11.4%
27.4%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.3%

Healthcare

5.3%
5.2%

Energy

4.0%
10.8%

Real Estate

4.0%
6.0%

Utilities

2.7%
8.3%

Technology

-

6.0%

Financial Services

FKUD.L
27.7%
FEUZ.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

FKUD.L
17.8%
FEUZ.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FKUD.L
13.2%
FEUZ.L
9.2%

Industrials

FKUD.L
11.4%
FEUZ.L
27.4%

Communication Services

FKUD.L
7.2%
FEUZ.L
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

FKUD.L
6.7%
FEUZ.L
5.3%

Healthcare

FKUD.L
5.3%
FEUZ.L
5.2%

Energy

FKUD.L
4.0%
FEUZ.L
10.8%

Real Estate

FKUD.L
4.0%
FEUZ.L
6.0%

Utilities

FKUD.L
2.7%
FEUZ.L
8.3%

Technology

FKUD.L

-

FEUZ.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares

Often compared with FKUD.L:
FKUD.L vs. FSKY.LFKUD.L vs. EEI.LFKUD.L vs. FBT.LFKUD.L vs. FCBR.LFKUD.L vs. MIVO.LFKUD.L vs. UD03.LFKUD.L vs. FDN.L
Often compared with FEUZ.L:
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.LFEUZ.L vs. ILFFEUZ.L vs. PRUK.LFEUZ.L vs. EEUD.LFEUZ.L vs. EDIV.LFEUZ.L vs. CSWG.LFEUZ.L vs. CAPS.L

Return for Risk

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FKUD.L
FKUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L
FEUZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FEUZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FKUD.LFEUZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.37
2.34

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.96
3.12

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.28

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

12.55

-7.17

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FEUZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUD.L and FEUZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FKUD.LFEUZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.34

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.80

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.74

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.79

-0.51

Drawdowns

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUD.L drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, which is greater than FEUZ.L's maximum drawdown of -36.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUD.L and FEUZ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FKUD.LFEUZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.29%

-36.68%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-10.35%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-14.10%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.27%

-23.27%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

-36.68%

-10.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-0.11%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-6.25%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.71%

+0.75%

Volatility

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that FKUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEUZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FKUD.LFEUZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

3.86%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

11.96%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

14.49%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

18.61%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

18.95%

-0.94%

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUD.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FEUZ.L's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKUD.L vs. FEUZ.L - Dividend Comparison

FKUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while FEUZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FEUZ.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist		0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

FKUD.L and FEUZ.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FKUD.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FKUD.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.L.

FKUD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while FEUZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FKUD.L and 0.80% for FEUZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKUD.L and FEUZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer