PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKUD.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKUD.L achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 11.99% return.


FKUD.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.07%
YTD
5.46%
6M
10.02%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
4.91%

UD03.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.74%
YTD
11.99%
6M
14.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist
5.46%24.21%7.17%10.50%-17.38%16.72%-9.94%-0.29%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
11.99%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUD.L and UD03.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.21

Over the past year, FKUD.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FKUD.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

27.7%
28.5%

Basic Materials

17.8%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
7.0%

Industrials

11.4%
12.1%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
14.6%

Healthcare

5.3%
4.1%

Energy

4.0%
2.7%

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Utilities

2.7%
7.7%

Technology

-

16.2%

Financial Services

FKUD.L
27.7%
UD03.L
28.5%

Basic Materials

FKUD.L
17.8%
UD03.L
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FKUD.L
13.2%
UD03.L
7.0%

Industrials

FKUD.L
11.4%
UD03.L
12.1%

Communication Services

FKUD.L
7.2%
UD03.L
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

FKUD.L
6.7%
UD03.L
14.6%

Healthcare

FKUD.L
5.3%
UD03.L
4.1%

Energy

FKUD.L
4.0%
UD03.L
2.7%

Real Estate

FKUD.L
4.0%
UD03.L

-

Utilities

FKUD.L
2.7%
UD03.L
7.7%

Technology

FKUD.L

-

UD03.L
16.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUD.L
FKUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKUD.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

5.67

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

16.11

-10.84

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUD.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKUD.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

3.44

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

1.74

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.19

-0.90

Drawdowns

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUD.L drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUD.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKUD.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.29%

-30.85%

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-9.80%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-11.72%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.27%

-18.67%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-1.45%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-3.32%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

3.56%

-0.11%

Volatility

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that FKUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKUD.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.69%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

16.20%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

27.51%

-12.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

47.36%

-29.35%

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUD.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKUD.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

FKUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than UD03.L's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.55%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKUD.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FKUD.L.

FKUD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FKUD.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKUD.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer