FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L).
FEUZ.L and VEUR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEUZ.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Oct 21, 2014. VEUR.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on May 21, 2013. Both FEUZ.L and VEUR.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEUZ.L or VEUR.L.
Correlation
The correlation between FEUZ.L and VEUR.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FEUZ.L:
0.96
VEUR.L:
1.13
FEUZ.L:
1.35
VEUR.L:
1.63
FEUZ.L:
1.17
VEUR.L:
1.19
FEUZ.L:
1.19
VEUR.L:
1.77
FEUZ.L:
2.62
VEUR.L:
3.99
FEUZ.L:
4.69%
VEUR.L:
2.90%
FEUZ.L:
12.74%
VEUR.L:
10.19%
FEUZ.L:
-36.68%
VEUR.L:
-28.59%
FEUZ.L:
-1.82%
VEUR.L:
-0.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUZ.L achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than VEUR.L's 6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ.L has underperformed VEUR.L with an annualized return of 7.51%, while VEUR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.42% annualized return.
FEUZ.L
5.11%
3.37%
7.20%
11.00%
4.41%
7.51%
VEUR.L
6.69%
5.31%
5.48%
10.97%
7.76%
8.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUZ.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEUR.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FEUZ.L
VEUR.L
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L - Dividend Comparison
FEUZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEUR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUZ.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% |
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.15% | 2.30% | 2.96% | 3.22% | 2.73% | 2.30% | 3.34% | 3.53% | 3.05% | 3.03% | 3.05% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUZ.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than VEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ.L and VEUR.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that FEUZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.